Subscribe to the News-Journal RSS Feed Mobile Access E-Newsletter Log In or Register as a New User 
Classifieds
Automotive
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise

Home > City Beat > Archives > Council elections category

Council elections

May 1, 2009

Mayoral candidates ask each other questions

One of the highlights of the Real Estate Council of Austin campaign forums is that they always let the candidates ask a question of one of their opponents. Here’s a rundown of what mayoral candidates Lee Leffingwell, Carole Keeton Strayhorn, Brewster McCracken, Josiah Ingalls and David Buttross asked each other today.

Leffingwell said McCracken used to be a strong proponent of light rail, but on the campaign trail has opposed holding a rail election next year, as Leffingwell has proposed. He asked McCracken whether he supports light rail or not.

McCracken said he still supports rail, but that the city and taxpayers can’t afford to take on the debt now to pay for it, given the grim state of the economy.

Strayhorn must be confident that she’s going to make it into a runoff with Leffingwell, because she rattled off a list of complaints about his council record then challenged him to two one-hour runoff debates. “I’d welcome that opportunity,” Leffingwell said.

McCracken said Leffingwell has only recently begun to talk about wanting to create jobs in the clean energy, bio tech and digital media fields (an idea McCracken has touted for months) but has also warned against “putting all our eggs in one basket.” He asked what other industries Leffingwell would recruit.

Leffingwell said local small businesses are “inherently diverse” and he would work to promote them. He said he has also talked about creating jobs in green energy, bio tech and digital media on his campaign Web site and as far back as his 2005 council campaign.

Ingalls asked McCracken why he didn’t take a stand and try to get Ingalls and Buttross included in a KXAN debate that they weren’t invited to. (Strayhorn and Leffingwell said the day before the debate that they wouldn’t go unless Ingalls and Buttross were invited. KXAN did allow all five to attend.)

McCracken said KXAN asked him, Leffingwell and Strayhorn early this year to attend the debate, and they all agreed to. “I kept my word. I said I’d go to the debate. I didn’t add any caveats or pull a last-minute political stunt,” he said.

Buttross noted that Leffingwell has been endorsed by 35 groups, including the city’s unions, and asked if that would entitle those groups to special treatment.

“Most of them are political clubs and have no financial interest in this at all,” Leffingwell said. “You could argue that a few, potentially, have some skin in the game, but the truth of the matter is that everyone that’s endorsed me has endorsed me because they believe I’m the best candidate for mayor.”

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 16, 2009

Correction on Leffingwell and parks in bond election

Last night, during the mayoral debate sponsored by the Statesman and KUT, I blogged on the candidate’s different positions on Council Member and mayoral candidate Lee Leffingwell’s proposal for a bond election in 2010.

I mistakenly wrote that Leffingwell wanted parks included in it. He didn’t mention parks.

Leffingwell talked only about transportation projects, saying that Austin is the most congested mid-size city in the country. He said he still wants rail included in the bond package but said it wasn’t likely to be included because an election authorizing the expansion of the rail system would also be needed.

The other four — Brewster McCracken, Carole Keeton Strayhorn, David Buttross and Josiah Ingalls — opposed a bond election next year, saying in different ways that the city couldn’t afford it now.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 13, 2009

LULAC representative weighs in one single-member districts

Gavino Fernandez, the coordinator of El Concilio and deputy director of the local League of United Latin American Citizens chapter, said Monday that he supports a proposal in the state Legislature that would mandate single-member districts in Austin.

The proposal would divide Austin into six districts of roughly equal population, and each would elect their own council member. Council members and the mayor are now elected citywide.

Council members said Monday that, despite differing opinions on single-member districts, they did not want the Legislature mandating a change and prefer that Austin voters approve a change.

To which Fernandez said in a statement: “Is it not ironic that this is the same government that went to the Legislature to enact laws to protect birds and bees in West Austin?”

The bill was proposed by Sen. Jeff Wentworth, a San Antonio Republican whose district extends into South Austin. Wentworth has noted that Austin is by far the largest Texas city not to have single-member districts.

Proponents of Austin’s current system say it heads off parochialism and protects black representation. Currently, one of the six council seats is set aside for a black council member, another for a Hispanic council member.

A switch to single-member districts would probably require 14 council members to ensure a majority-black district. Hispanics now make up about a quarter of Austin’s population, but only 14 percent of its City Council.

Permalink | Comments (9) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 9, 2009

Highlights from the environmental forum

City Council candidates have gathered here at City Hall for the Austin Combined Environmental Forum. The candidates for the City Council have just finished, and the mayoral candidates will start shortly.

Here’s a recap:

Place 2: In the most interesting round, Incumbent Mike Martinez defended his push to delay a vote on the controversial Wildflower development — a move that infuriated Austin environmental activists — while opponent Joe Quintero accused the environmental groups who organized the forum of hypocrisy.

Martinez said he pushed for the delay on the Wildflower project because it had seemed to meet all city regulations, but an 11th-hour meeting with environmental activists left him with questions. The council decided to delay the vote until August, and some activists were upset because the council didn’t take public comment on the project before the delay. Martinez said the delay will require the project to go through the city’s evaluation process again, during which time the public will have opportunities to weigh in.

Martinez, answering a question about whether he would push for the closure of Pure Casting, a company that some activists say is polluting its East Austin neighborhood, said he was the first council member to make such a call.

Quintero looked incredulously at the panel when the question was put to him and responded that most of the environmental groups sponsoring the forum had not helped East Austin much while pushing for projects not wanted there, such as a recycling facility.

“You allow those things, then you want me to answer the question of whether you want Pure Casting in East Austin? … There’s a double standard.”

Place 6: Challenger Sam Osemene spent much of his time criticizing incumbent Sheryl Cole, who said she has worked effectively on environmental issues during her time on the council.

Cole said she isn’t yet convinced the city should delay building its Water Treatment Plant 4, a project some environmental groups don’t like because of its location and argue isn’t necessary with the city’s water-conservation initiative. But, Cole said, if Austin’s conservation programs continue curbing the city’s water use, she would consider it.

Osemene said the plant isn’t necessary and pledged to delay it if elected.

Place 1: Perla Cavazos and Chris Riley spent most of their session agreeing with one another. For instance, on a question about where Austin should get its energy in the future, both said Austin should aggressively switch to solar, wind and other sources of renewable energy.

Place 5 candidate Bill Spelman, who is running unopposed, pledged to work on multimodal transportation, work on various environmental issues and head off urban sprawl, which will require more population density in the city.

Permalink | Comments (11) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

March 22, 2009

Council candidates take questions

City Council candidates took questions today about a new animal shelter, locally grown food, the city’s Web site and other topics at a forum hosted by the citizens’ group Better Austin Today. Ten of the 12 candidates for five seats showed up.

We thought we’d highlight one question to give a taste of what each candidate had to say. Answers below are summarized and paraphrased.

Question: What would you do to ensure that we have a more citizen-driven city government?

David Buttross (mayoral candidate): Change the City Council to district representatives. (Right now, all 7 council members represent the whole city, and some folks say it’s tough for different parts of town to get their issues addressed.)

Brewster McCracken (mayoral candidate): Build consensus around projects that will be included in a 2012 bond election that he’s proposed. The election would be for projects like neighborhood parks, athletic fields, swimming pools, bike paths and sidewalks.

Josiah Ingalls (mayoral candidate): Pick up the phone to alert neighborhoods to issues that might affect them, rather than just posting information on the city’s Web site.

Lee Leffingwell (mayoral candidate): Post council meeting agenda items earlier so that the public has more time to review them; hold some council meetings outside of City Hall; form a cabinet of community leaders to advise him; hold an election proposing a mixed system of citywide and district-based council seats.

Chris Riley (Place 1 candidate): Make the city’s Web site more user-friendly and add data; overhaul the infamous “neighborhood planning” process; better heed the policy advice of the city’s many volunteer boards; hold office hours during which any citizen can stop by.

Perla Cavazos (Place 1 candidate): Allow more time for public comment before making key decisions, such as choosing a firm to write a long-term growth plan; increase citizen participation in the crafting of the city budget.

Mike Martinez (Place 2 incumbent): The lead advocate for creating a mixed system of citywide and district council seats, he said he’s continue pushing for an election to let voters weigh in on the idea.

Bill Spelman (only Place 5 candidate): Agreed with Martinez that some sort of mixed system or geographic representation is needed.

Sam Osemene (Place 6 candidate): Said the city needs to listen better to the people and stop offering subsidies to big companies.

Sheryl Cole (Place 6 incumbent): Upgrade the city’s Web site; hold some meetings outside of City Hall; do a better job of listening to the city’s many commissions.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

March 9, 2009

List of Austin council candidates is set

The final slate of Austin City Council candidates is now set. Today at 5 p.m. was the deadline to file to run for the May 9 election.

Five people will vie to be Austin’s next mayor: council members Brewster McCracken and Lee Leffingwell, former mayor Carole Keeton Strayhorn, real estate investor David Buttross and Josiah Ingalls, a houseman at a local hotel.

Only one of the four other council races, Place 1, is looking particularly competitive. Public policy analyst Perla Cavazos and attorney Chris Riley will compete for that seat, which Leffingwell is vacating.

Bill Spelman, a former council member and a public affairs professor at the University of Texas, is guaranteed a seat on the dais. He’s the only person running for McCracken’s current seat, Place 5.

Council Members Mike Martinez and Sheryl Cole will compete against lesser-known candidates in their re-election bids. Martinez will face Jose Quintero, a sales representative for a wine distribution company, in Place 2. In Place 6, Cole will face Sam Osemene, a government professor at Austin Community College.

Permalink | Comments (8) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

February 25, 2009

Riley and Cavazos split union endorsements

The city’s police and EMS unions have endorsed Chris Riley in the race for Place 1 on the Austin City Council. But the firefighters’ union and the Central Labor Council — which is made up of 30 smaller groups, including Austin’s non-public-safety employees’ union — are backing candidate Perla Cavazos.

Riley is a lawyer; Cavazos is a former policy analyst for state Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr.

Place 1 is shaping up as the only competitive race this spring, aside from the mayor’s race. Mike Martinez and Sheryl Cole are running for re-election in places 2 and 6, and have drawn no significant challengers. Former council member Bill Spelman is the sole candidate for Place 5, the seat being vacated by Brewster McCracken, who’s running for mayor.

The unions have wielded considerable clout in past council races, aggressively raising money and campaigning for their candidates. But they’ve kept a fairly low profile in the past few campaign cycles, so it will be interesting to see how actively they campaign for Riley, Cavazos and Lee Leffingwell, their choice for mayor.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

January 15, 2009

Candidates report fundraising

Today is the first chance the public will have to see how fundraising is going in the May city council races. There will likely be four seats up this year, in addition to the mayoral race.

The reports are due to the city clerk’s office by 5 p.m. Thursday. To view the reports, check the city clerk’s Web site.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

January 7, 2009

Mike Martinez kicking off re-election campaign Jan. 14

City Council Member Mike Martinez will kick off his bid for a second term on Wednesday, Jan. 14 when he holds a fundraiser at Nuevo Leon Mexican Restaurant in East Austin.

“I couldn’t think of a better and more appropriate location to launch my re-election bid to Place 2 on the City Council,” Martinez said in a statement. The fundraiser is scheduled to run from go from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

No candidate has so far declared a challenge to Martinez in the May city elections.

Permalink | Comments (4) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

December 18, 2008

Candidates gear up for council races

While city watchers are wondering who is in or out of the spring mayoral race, a small crowd is gathering for the rest of the seats for Austin City Council.

Chris Riley, former Planning Commission chair and Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association founder, and Rick Cofer, Solid Waste Advisory Commission vice chair and Pecan Springs-Springdale Neighborhood Association vice president, are among those who have filed paperwork showing that they seek a council seat and have appointed a campaign treasurer.

Former planning commissioner Perla Cavazos also is considering a run and has filed paperwork. And former City Council member Bill Spelman already has announced for Place 5.

With as many as four council seats up in 2009, plus a mayoral contest, candidates are already beating the bushes for donations and holding campaign events.

Feb. 7 is the first day a candidate may file for a place on the May 9 ballot.

Council places two, five and six, currently held by Mike Martinez, Brewster McCracken and Sheryl Cole, respectively, are up for grabs. McCracken announced last week that he is running for mayor.

Riley and Cavazos said they are interested in Place 1, which is the seat of Lee Leffingwell, who also is considering a run for mayor. Cofer has also been mentioned as a candidate for the spot, but did not specify on his treasurer paperwork. Leffingwell can’t announce a campaign or start raising money until Jan. 9 if he wants to avoid resigning his Place 1 seat and triggering a special election.

Trevor Titman, who according to his Web site is a college dropout whose political experience includes a term as the seventh grade Latin club president, also filed paperwork indicating that he is seeking a council seat.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

December 15, 2008

PAC kicks off efforts for Leffingwell candidacy

The Council Member hasn’t officially tossed his hat into the ring, but the Draft Lee Leffingwell for Mayor political action committee at noon today announced its support of him, citing Leffingwell’s knowledge of various local issues and describing him as the person who can lead the city in a tough economy.

“I know what the job of mayor requires,” said former Austin mayor Gus Garcia, one of the committee’s 10 co-chairs. “Lee’s the right person for the job.”

The various backgrounds of the co-chairs allowed them to speak to what they considered Leffingwell’s strengths, ranging from the environment, social services, union relations and his perspective on Austin’s growth and transportation issues.

Aside from Garcia, the other co-chairs include: Mandy Dealey, planning commission member; Alicia Del Rio, Texas president of the National Women’s Political Caucus; Amy Everhart, a Sierra Club organizer; Joene Grissom, past chair of Community Action Network and Child Care Council; Jack Kirfman, of the American Federation of State, Council and Municipal Employees; Ramey Ko, president of Capital Area Asian American Democrats; Joe Pinnelli, a general contractor and past president of Austin Heritage Society; Ted Siff, a publisher and past executive director of Austin Parks Foundation; and Beverly Silas, former executive director of Envision Central Texas.

Committee members declined to speak about the differences between Leffingwell and Council Member Brewster McCracken, who announced his mayoral bid a week ago.

They were not there to talk about that, Garcia said, adding that that would come out during the campaigns. “We’re here supporting Lee because we like the way he does things,” Garcia said.

“We want to make sure he knows there’s a bunch of people who support what he’s considering doing,” said co-chair Siff, who is the committee treasurer.

The committee also today provided a list of more than 100 supporters, including Council Member Mike Martinez and Paul Carrozza, of RunTex.

McCracken, 42, is the only person so far to formally announce a mayoral bid. Former Texas comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, former Texas Monthly publisher Mike Levy and Council Member Lee Leffingwell have also expressed interest in the job. Leffingwell can’t announce a campaign or start raising money until Jan. 9 if he wants to avoid resigning his Place 1 seat and triggering a special election.

Two other people have filed preliminary paperwork to run for mayor: perennial council candidate Jennifer Gale and Austin resident Josiah Ingalls.

The election is May 9.

Permalink | Comments (44) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

December 8, 2008

It's official: McCracken will run for mayor

Surrounded by more than 100 supporters, Austin Council Member Brewster McCracken announced today that he plans to run for mayor.

“By innovating while remaining true to our community values, we will achieve the promise of what a great American city can be,” he told the crowd gathered in a cavernous white room at Heliovolt, a photovoltaic company.

McCracken, who is currently serving his second, three-year council term, said his campaign will center on four themes:

  • Creating jobs in biotech, health care, film, digital media and clean energy (hence the campaign kickoff at Heliovolt);

  • Leading the Pecan Street Project, an effort to draw renewable energy experts to Austin to develop a new electrical grid and utility business model;

  • Starting a program to train Austinites in green-collar and health care jobs, and creating an endowment fund to invest in health care, affordable housing and open space;

  • Improving Austin’s quality of life by paying for new sidewalks, neighborhood parks and athletic fields through a 2012 bond election

McCracken warned that Austin will face tough times in the coming months and years, as the economy continues to slow. (The council has already slashed $25 million from the 2009 budget and will likely have to cut more.)

But McCracken noted that when Austin’s economy faltered in the 1980s, city leaders lured the semiconductor industry here instead of giving up. Austin needs to do the same thing now, he said.

“We need to be cautious about making new financial commitments,” he said. “But this is the wrong time for inaction and lack of vision.”

McCracken, 42, is the only person so far to formally announce a mayoral bid. Former Texas comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, former Texas Monthly publisher Mike Levy and Council Member Lee Leffingwell have also expressed interest in the job. Leffingwell can’t announce a campaign or start raising money until Jan. 9 if he wants to avoid resigning his Place 1 seat and triggering a special election.

Environmental activist Ted Siff filed paperwork at the city clerk’s office this morning to form a political action committee called Draft Lee Leffingwell for Mayor to start raising money for Leffingwell.

Permalink | Comments (51) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

December 5, 2008

McCracken makes mayoral bid official Monday

Austin City Council Member Brewster McCracken, whose interest in becoming Austin mayor has been an open secret for over a year, will officially announce Monday that he’ll run for the job this spring.

The announcement is set for Monday at noon at Heliovolt, an Austin photovoltaic company.

McCracken, who’s serving his second term, joins a crowded list of possible contenders to replace Mayor Will Wynn, whose term ends in June. Austin City Council Member Lee Leffingwell, former Austin mayor and Texas comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn and retired Texas Monthly publisher Mike Levy have also expressed interest in the job, though only Strayhorn has filed a campaign treasurer form with the clerk’s office, freeing her to start raising money.

A Corpus Christi native, McCracken, 42, went to Princeton then got a law degree from the University of Texas. He worked as a prosecutor in Harris County before coming to Austin to work for private law firms.

He first ran for council in 2002, losing to Betty Dunkerley. He was elected in 2003 and won re-election in 2006 by 72 percent of the vote.

McCracken has a self-taught interest in New Urbanism — creating dense, walkable areas where people can live, work, and play — and has led three major land-use initiatives.

He worked with residents, developers and business groups for more than two years to write design rules for new shopping areas. He also helped write incentives to encourage developers to build projects that have a dense mix of housing, shops and offices along major roads.

And McCracken led the 2006 effort to write the controversial “McMansion ordinance,” which limits the size of of new or renovated homes in older, central-city neighborhoods.

In 2004, a citizens group petitioned to try to oust McCracken and Wynn for voting in favor of a toll-road plan. The group eventually removed McCracken as a target. The petition effort failed.

McCracken has been a vocal critic of cost increases in police and firefighter contracts, and last year he pushed for, then backed away from, a ban on panhandling.

He’s backed Wynn’s idea to have a public vote on building a Central Austin passenger rail system that would connect the airport, downtown and the University of Texas, as well as the Triangle and Mueller developments.

And McCracken recently helped form a group called the Pecan Street Project, which aims to bring great minds of clean energy — and the money and jobs that come with them — to Austin to develop the electrical grid and utility business model of the future.

McCracken has a 4-year-old son, Ford, with his ex-wife Mindy Montford, who lost a bid for Travis County District Attorney this year. Last month, McCracken married Sarah Groos, a program manager at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Foundation.

Two other people have filed to run for mayor: perennial council candidate Jennifer Gale and Austin resident Josiah Ingalls.

The election is May 9.

Permalink | Comments (43) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

October 20, 2008

Prop. 2 campaigns heat up with start of voting

The start of early voting resulted in dueling press conferences today over Proposition 2, a City of Austin ballot referendum.

If approved, Prop. 2 would prohibit the city from giving financial incentives to current or future retail projects.

The measure landed on the Nov. 4 ballot after the group Stop Domain Subsidies gathered thousands of signatures to prevent the city from paying out millions in tax rebates that it promised Simon Property Group Inc., owner of the Domain shopping center in North Austin.

Stop Domain’s founder, Brian Rodgers, said today that Simon is hypocritical because the company recently lobbied the El Paso City Council not to give millions in tax incentives to a competitor.

His evidence? A letter Simon sent to El Paso residents.

“Giving up sales tax revenue will cost taxpayers millions of dollars and will make funds available to the developer which will lead to tenant inducements ultimately favoring one shopping center owner over others,” the letter said.

Stop Domain has argued virtually the same thing; that the the Domain subsidies hurt small businesses by giving Simon an advantage.

“I don’t think it’s fair to use my tax dollars to subsidize a competitor,” said Matthew Culmo, one of two dozen small-business owners who joined Rodgers at a press conference. Culmo owns By George, an upscale clothing store on South Congress Avenue and Lamar Boulevard.

At a later press conference, Mayor Will Wynn, surrounded by a crowd of supporters, urged voters to reject Prop. 2, saying the city must honor its agreements. Prop. 2’s passage would trigger lawsuits, lower Austin’s stellar AAA bond rating and unravel parts of the Mueller agreement to redevelop the airport into homes, stores and offices, he said.

Kathleen Shields, a senior vice president at Simon, said in a statement that the El Paso shopping area is not a good point of comparison because it is a very different kind of project than the Domain and is only a proposal, not an already-built project with an existing agreement.

Permalink | Comments (21) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

June 14, 2008

Morrison wins council seat

Laura Morrison achieved a landslide victory Saturday night in a runoff for an Austin City Council seat.

Morrison, a disaster management consultant, got 65.2 percent of the vote; her opponent, urban planner Cid Galindo, got 34.8 percent.

Morrison will replace retiring council member Betty Dunkerley at a June 25 swearing-in ceremony.

Galindo said he was very proud of the campaign he ran and hasn’t ruled out trying against next year. At least two council seats will be up for grabs then, and possibly a few more if Council Member Brewster McCracken and Council Member Lee Leffingwell decide to run for mayor.

“I’m committed to this city and to the idea of how we need to grow and I will be involved in the future of this city,” he said.

The runoff campaign turned caustic in its final days as Galindo and Morrison traded barbs in a series of mailers, TV ads and phone calls.

Galindo accused Morrison of wanting to require homeowners to make energy-efficiency upgrades before they can sell their homes. Morrison said she would not support such a mandate.

Morrison has painted Galindo as a real estate developer who would promote rapid growth and sprawl as a council member.

Galindo said he is an urban planner who wants to reduce sprawl by creating seven town centers (each with a densely packed mix of housing, offices and shops) on Austin’s eastern perimeter.

Permalink | Comments (11) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

June 2, 2008

Galindo slams Morrison in mailer

A runoff election that has been very tame is suddenly getting heated.

Place 4 Austin City Council candidate Cid Galindo has sent out a mailer bashing his opponent, Laura Morrison. It says that Morrison supports requiring energy-efficiency upgrades to homes; wants to delay building an affordable neighborhood downtown; and wants to “install a $36 million city computer system that would allow identity thieves to invade our privacy if we communicate with a council member on the Internet.”

Efficiency upgrades is an idea that a city task force is considering, but it is not a formal proposal yet. Galindo says he is categorically against the concept, because it would financially burden homeowners. Greening up homes should be done through incentives instead of a mandate, he said.

Morrison stressed that there is no proposal yet, and said she won’t support any plan that unduly burdens folks who want to sell their homes.

Galindo thinks the city should choose a developer soon to redevelop the Green Water Treatment Plant downtown. That city-owned land is one of the best remaining options for building affordable housing downtown, he said. Morrison said city leaders should slow down and take more time to gather residents’ ideas for the land.

“Each of the (bidding) developers stated that they will need some kind of public financing, which means taxpayer dollars. I think there needs to be some kind of public scrutiny because that’s our money,” she said.

The computer system item refers to a citizen-initiated referendum that voters rejected in 2006 that would have required the city to post more public records online. Morrison campaigned for the referendum.

Galindo’s claim is “absurd political propaganda,” she said. “I believe in open government. Since the voters turned down the (2006 referendum), we’ll continue to strive to find other ways to have an open, transparent government.”

Permalink | Comments (9) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

May 21, 2008

Council canvasses May 10 election

It’s official: Lee Leffingwell will hold on to the Place 1 council seat and Randi Shade steps into Place 3.

The council canvassed the results of the May 10 vote at a budget work session this morning, noting that the newly and re-elected council members will begin their terms on June 25.

“Please join me in congratulating Council Member Lee Leffingwell,” Mayor Will Wynn said, handing the Place 1 council member a certificate.

“I’m just glad to note that there are no speakers in opposition,” Leffingwell said, drawing laughter.

Shade, who defeated Place 3 incumbent Jennifer Kim, was not at the meeting.

But election season isn’t over yet.

Cid Galindo and Laura Morrison have to get through a run-off for the Place 4 seat. They will draw names this afternoon to see whose name goes first on the ballot for the June 14 election.

Permalink | Comments (7) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

May 13, 2008

Cravey won't endorse in Place 4 runoff

M5X00178_7.JPG

Robin Cravey has decided he won’t endorse either of the candidates in a runoff for the Austin City Council Place 4 seat.

Cravey, an Austin lawyer and poet, finished third out of the six candidates vying for Place 4 in Saturday’s election.

Disaster management consultant Laura Morrison and urban planner Cid Galindo got the most votes Saturday and are now headed for a June 14 runoff. Both will try to convince Cravey’s fans to now support them. We’re guessing that the environmentally minded folks who backed Cravey are more likely to support Morrison, a former Austin Neighborhoods Council president who’s been endorsed by the Austin Sierra Club.

Cravey said he spoke to Galindo and Morrison by phone Monday. “Both of them were gracious in their praise of my campaign, and I congratulated each of them on their success. I expressed my hope that the two of them would be able to continue running positive campaigns in the runoff,” he said.

Permalink | Comments (22) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

May 7, 2008

Early voting totals out

Even by recent standards, Saturday’s local elections haven’t galvanized Travis County’s electorate.

Early voting ended Tuesday. Just under 20,000 people around the county cast ballots in city council, school board and other local races.

That’s 3.47 percent of the county’s eligible voters, which is actually a bigger early turnout than last year’s May election — but last year Austin didn’t have any city council races, either.

A light turnout in early voting is no surprise. In the May elections you don’t get Obama-rama and Clintonitis, nor do you get cigar-smoking Jewish country singers or Governor Good Hair.

According to the Travis County clerk’s office, the recent record for early turnout in a May election was in 2005 with 5.4 percent of the registered voters, many riled up about the proposed smoking ban. The next year, when Mayor Will Wynn cruised to an easy May victory, 4.5 percent of the county’s voters went to the polls early.

County Clerk Dana DeBeauvoir said it’s hard to say what this year’s early voting totals will mean for turnout. But she said it’s a safe bet turnout will be light Saturday. In the May 2005 election, the biggest local one in years, a whopping 14 percent of the county’s voters cast ballots.

Permalink | Comments (15) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

May 2, 2008

Kim, Shade square off on ads, mailers

X00227_7.JPG

Jennifer Kim and Randi Shade continue to trade barbs in the Place 3 City Council race. Shade is questioning whether Kim stretched the truth on some of the points in her TV ad and campaign mailers.

Here’s the low-down on those points:

Pay raises: Kim says in her TV ad that she refused to accept a pay raise that the council approved in 2006.

Shade says: Kim pushed for the pay raise initially, then backed away from it when the public slammed the idea. We called Council Member

M5X00103_7.JPG

Betty Dunkerley to ask what happened; Dunkerley said Kim approached her in 2006 and asked her to propose the pay raise.

Kim says: She was only interested in a raise to be able to put the extra money into an IRA and save for retirement. (Council members can’t contribute to the city’s retirement system.) Kim said she also wanted an independent body to review the council salaries and recommend whether they deserved a raise. When that idea was taken off the table, Kim said she voted for the raise but refused to personally accept it.

Water treatment plant: Kim says in a mailer that she successfully prevented a new water treatment plant from being developed in the Balcones Canyonlands Preserve.”

Shade says: Kim is exaggerating. Kim was the only council member who voted against putting a plant in the BCP, but Kim supported building a new plant in East Austin that some community activists opposed, Shade said. Also, other council members took the lead on finding an alternative plant site.

Kim says: Before the council chose an alternative plant site, she was talking with environmental board members and working behind the scenes to “build up the pressure in the community and the city staff to do the right thing” and not build it on environmentally sensitive land.

Domain subsidies: Kim says in her TV ad that she opposes tax giveaways to corporate shopping malls.

Kim says: She supports a citizen-initiated charter amendment that would prevent the city from paying out a tax-subsidies agreement for the Domain shopping center. (But she thinks the Mueller airport redevelopment agreement would have to be tweaked first so that the amendment would not negatively affect it.)

Shade says: Kim is being hypocritical, because she and the rest of the council approved a resolution in December that says the city should honor the Domain subsidies agreement.

Campaign consultant: Kim says in a mailer that “Randi Shade’s top campaign adviser is a powerful City Hall insider and developer lobbyist who already advises several council members.”

Kim says: The advisor (Mark Nathan) lobbied for developments such as Barton Place, a condo project planned near Zilker Park. He also worked on the campaigns of five out of seven sitting council members. “He’s making money by lobbying the council members for special interests and those same council members owe their elections to him.”

Shade says: Nathan’s lobbying registration with the city expired in December and he did not renew it. Nathan notes that Kim asked him to work for his campaign before he decided to work for Shade. Nathan says that in eight years of working in city politics, he has only lobbied for two projects and adds that the developer of one project is supporting Kim’s campaign this year.

Permalink | Comments (22) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

May 1, 2008

Free cab rides for seniors on election day

Senior citizens can catch a free cab ride to the polls on election day.

Lone Star Cab, through a partnership with Council Member Mike Martinez’s office, will be offering trips to and from voting locations for residents age 60 and older.

The free rides will be available between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. on May 10. Three city council seats are up for election that day.

“Voting is one of the fundamental rights that we all have in this country, and I applaud Lone Star’s efforts to facilitate exercising that right through an important community service for our seniors,” Martinez said in a statement.

Interested senior voters should contact Solomon Kassa at Lone Star Cab for more information and to reserve a ride between May 4 and May 8. He can be reached at 836-4900.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 25, 2008

Kim consultant steps down

Matt Hersh, a general consultant to Council Member Jennifer Kim’s re-election campaign, said today that he’s stepping down.

Hersh e-mailed a letter to Kim’s supporters today saying that his wife is eight months pregnant and he’s leaving to spend more time with his family.

He wrote that in the six months he has worked for Kim, “I grew to have tremendous respect for her as a person and as an elected official. She is unbelievably smart and has a tremendous passion about policy and the issues. Most of all, she has done a good job and deserves to be re-elected,” he said.

Permalink | Comments (21) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 23, 2008

Kim knocks Shade on SOS comments

Council Member Jennifer Kim is criticizing comments that her re-election opponent, Randi Shade, made recently about the Save Our Springs Ordinance.

Voters passed the ordinance in 1992 to limit development over the Barton Springs portion of the Edwards Aquifer. The ordinance stemmed from SOS’ efforts to stop Freeport McMoRan Inc.’s plans to develop a retail/residential project in southwestern Travis County.

Shade was asked at a campaign forum: “You told (Stop Domain Subsidies founder) Brian Rodgers that we should have negotiated SOS instead of passing SOS. Why?”

Shade said: “What I told (Rogers) was how sad it made me to see it result in legislative action. That the will of the citizens … was basically taken by legislative process. And that there wasn’t better compromise that made everybody a winner. Because really when you saw the original proposal less land would have been developed than what ultimately did get developed.”

Kim’s campaign e-mailed out a letter Tuesday signed by environmental activists Robin Rather, Brigid Shea and Bill Bunch that said: “(The SOS ordinance) was put on the ballot by citizen initiative after decades of attempted negotiation with the developers who were building over the watershed … the community made clear its will with the overwhelming passage of the SOS ordinance that the Springs were to be protected, not bargained away.”

Shade said today that she supported the SOS ordinance back then and supports it now. She said she was referring to her wish that there had been a compromise to prevent the passage of 1995 state legislation that grandfathered properties and weakened the city’s ability to enforce the ordinance.

Rodgers has endorsed Kim. Bunch said he has not decided whether to support Kim or Shade.

Permalink | Comments (17) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 16, 2008

City council ads prompt ethics complaint

A supporter of Place 1 City Council incumbent Lee Leffingwell has filed a complaint with the Texas Ethics Commission about two advertisements in the Austin Chronicle that urge readers to vote for challenger Jason Meeker.

Former political consultant Mike Blizzard filed the complaint on Wednesday afternoon, alleging that the ads violated state and local election code.

Blizzard is not a consultant for anyone running for city council this Spring, but he said does support Meeker’s opponent, incumbent Lee Leffingwell.

The ads in question, bearing Meeker’s picture and the words “Vote for Jason Meeker on May 10th,” were printed on the top of a full page Discount Electronics advertisement in the Austin Chronicle.

The owner of Discount Electronics, Rick Culleton, was Meeker’s campaign treasurer until about a week before the first ad was printed.

Culleton said Wednesday that the ads were designed and printed without any input from Meeker. He said the second ad was paid from a personal account, not his business’ account.

“I certainly am not trying to break any rules,” Culleton said.

Permalink | Comments (23) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 14, 2008

Candidates answer City Beat

We posed a series of questions about city issues to the candidates in the May city council races. See what they said:

  • Place 1 — Allen Demling, Lee Leffingwell and Jason Meeker
  • Place 3 — Jennifer Kim, Randi Shade and Ken Weiss.
  • Place 4 — Robin Cravey, Jennifer Gale, Cid Galindo, Laura Morrison, Sam Osemene and Ken Vasseau.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

Statesman.com hosts Austin City Council video debates

With less than a month to go before the May 10 City Council elections the campaigns are gearing up to full speed.

If you can’t make it to any of the remaining candidate forums, you can still see the candidates debate the issues on Statesman.com. You can also find our past campaign coverage, including Q & A for all the candidates, on the bloghere.

We invited the candidates for Place 1 and Place 3 to the American-Statesman and grilled them on the issues. (The Place 4 race has six candidates and appears destined for a run-off. So we will revisit that race in May to give candidates a chance to give more substantial answers.)

In case you lost track, Place 1 features Allen Demling, Lee Leffingwell and Jason Meeker.

We’re still having trouble with the Place 3 video. We’ll get it up as soon as we can get the audio back.

Permalink | Comments (4) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

Place 3 City Council Candidate Q & A

We posed a series of questions to candidates for all the Austin City Council races. Early voting starts April 28 for the May 10 municipal election.

Here are the answers from Place 3 candidates Jennifer Kim, Randi Shade and Ken Weiss.

Jennifer Kim

X00227_7.JPG

Web site: www.kimforaustin.com

Age: 35

Occupation: Council member; vice president of VIAS International LLC

Education: Bachelor’s degree in political science, Texas A&M University; master’s degree in public affairs, Princeton University

Experience: Owner, Computer Moms franchise, 2003-06; legislative aide for Texas Sen. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, 1993-95; economic development specialist for the federal Economic Development Administration, 1998-2002; board member for groups including the Social Equity Commission, Census 2000 Complete County Committee, Commission on Immigrant Affairs, 1998-2001

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I believe this is a decision for the community to make. But before we put the issue to the voters, lots of details need to be worked out. First, we need to find a public process that would result in a decision about the appropriate number of districts. There also needs to be a full public discussion on the pros and cons of the current system, an all-district system, or a hybrid system. We also need to be absolutely certain that there is no dilution of minority representation. That would be an unacceptable direction for the city to go in. Once these issues have been resolved, the districts need to be placed on a map so citizens know what plan they would be voting on.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

The city needs to be very careful when it comes to giving incentives to bring employers to Austin, especially for retail agreements. The Domain subsidies that were agreed to in 2003 are very problematic. With the quality of life that Austin has to offer, such incentives are not needed to attract businesses. The jobs that may have been created are mostly low paid, low skilled jobs that do not offer a living wage. When the city considers entering into these agreements, we must be very certain and clear about exactly what the city is getting in return for what it is giving. The benefits must reach the entire community, should be environmentally sound, should make some contribution to the affordability of Austin, either in housing or in helping local businesses, and companies should pay a living wage.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

My top budget priority will continue to be affordability. This includes making sure families can afford homes and quality day care throughout Austin. While on the council, I led in securing agreements to provide more affordable housing in new developments and am working with a diverse group of affordable housing advocates, real estate experts and neighborhood representatives to find ways to preserve our existing affordable housing stock. I initiated the Families and Children Task Force to ensure there is affordable, quality child care available throughout the city. And I have secured additional resources to help small businesses get off the ground, grow, and thrive. We now have staff to help small businesses navigate the city’s planning process, develop business plans, do market research, and much more.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The city should focus on affordable housing both downtown and in other areas of town. That is why I created the Austin Affordable Housing Incentives Task Force to establish city policy to create more affordable housing throughout Austin. We passed a resolution providing a range of incentives to include affordable housing, becoming the only city in the state of Texas to do so.
Currently, I am working on including affordable housing in the Green Water Treatment Plant redevelopment, preserving existing affordable housing stock in Austin, and advocating for the preservation and creation of affordable housing should there be redevelopment of the Brackenridge Tract.

Randi Shade

M5X00103_7.JPG

Web site: www.randishade.com

Age: 41

Occupation: Founder of Charitygift, an Internet charitable giving site; former executive director, Entrepreneurs Foundation of Central Texas

Education: Bachelor’s degree, University of Texas; master’s in business administration, Harvard Business School

Experience: Director of national development for City Year, 1996; founding executive director of Texas Commission on Volunteerism and Community Service under Gov. Ann Richards, 1993-95; UT student body president, 1987-88; board member of groups including PeopleFund (2001-07), University of Texas Hillel Foundation (1993-95 and 2002-05) and the Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce (2000-03).

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I don’t believe the current system of representation is broken, but I do believe it’s possible the citizens could be better served by a mixed system incorporating some single-member districts and some at-large seats. A mixed system would ensure that every citizen would have more than just one representative, while still offering the opportunity for more responsive, more accountable, and possibly more diverse representation. The devil is always in the details, though, so I can’t say for sure whether I would be in favor or opposed to changing our current system until I know what alternative is on the table. At this point, I support the mayor’s position that we wait until after the 2010 census, when we have more current demographic information, to revisit the issue.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

Incentives should be used rarely and only when they provide a clear, direct economic benefit to current local employers and residents. Any economic development strategy — including tax incentives, waivers, or rebates — which fails to generate job opportunities for a broad range of low and middle-income Austin residents and which fails to create new local tax revenue sufficient to pay for the cost of the growth it has facilitated is a failed strategy, in my book. I also generally oppose incentives for retail projects in order to ensure that local, regional and national retailers are competing on a level playing field. In all circumstances, I will be a strong advocate for transparency, including the use of an independent auditor to ensure that job creation, salaries, and other performance requirements are met before any city-granted granted economic benefit is received.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

My top budget priority will be to ensure, on an ongoing basis, that the taxpayers of Austin are receiving a good overall return for their investment in city government. That means working every day — not just at budget time — to deliver efficient and reliable basic services, to root out and eliminate waste in every function of every department, and to maintain a low tax rate. I also believe that council members and top city management should post office expenses online as a matter of policy, and that City Hall should be working now to create a system for posting city revenues and expenses online, in rapid fashion, if not in real time, for citizens to view. In terms of spending priorities, I want to invest more wisely in the city’s partnerships with local non-profit organizations to eliminate the impact poverty has on our community’s safety and well-being.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The City should be focused on achieving more affordable housing in both the downtown area and in outlying areas. While the value system of our community dictates that we work to ensure that downtown housing is accessible to people at all income levels, we know broader and deeper affordability in outlying areas is easier to achieve because land prices and construction costs are lower. We also know downtown living isn’t a desire for all citizens. The City Council needs to focus now on ensuring the judicious use of voter-approved bond funding for affordable housing, on facilitating the development of the Community Land Trust, and on creating additional mechanisms that encourage the participation of the private sector in the development of affordable housing. The city should also strengthen its relationships with key local non-profit organizations already working successfully in this arena.

Kenneth Weiss

M5X00229_7.JPG

Web site: www.weissforplace3.com

Age: 39

Occupation: Maintenance manager for a party company.

Education: Bachelor’s degree in business from Concordia University

Experience: Soldier in National Guard, 2000-06; owner of a trucking company, 1992-2006; owner of a bike rental shop, 1987-2000

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I believe that the citizens of Austin should decide what type of government they should have. The government shouldn’t decide on what type of government the citizens of Austin should have! Let’s bring back government by the people, for the people! So, yes, I believe that it should be placed on the ballot.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

I support no tax abatements or subsidies to big business. I will work extremely hard to make Austin small-business friendly. Having operated two small businesses right here in Austin, I understand and know the challenges that small businesses face everyday. I propose that the city hold annual or semi-annual seminars and workshops for small businesses that would bring together different business groups in Austin and from local colleges and universities.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

This is one of the many items that I am considering. I will study and propose a small business stimulus plan which will include seminars and workshops sponsored by the city which may also include discounted city utilities and rebates on city taxes to small businesses that want to start up here in Austin or want to expand.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

I believe that we should provide affordable housing in all areas of Austin. It’s always nice when you are able to afford to live near where you work or play, especially with today’s fuel costs.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

Place 1 City Council Candidate Q & A

We posed a series of questions to candidates for all the Austin City Council races. Early voting starts April 28 for the May 10 municipal election.

Here are the answers from Place 1 candidates Allen Demling, Lee Leffingwell and Jason Meeker.

Allen Demling

M5X00118_7.JPG

Web site: www.allendemling.org

Age: 28

Occupation: Mechanical engineer

Education: Bachelor’s degree in general engineering, University of Illinois, master’s degree in mechanical engineering, University of Texas

Experience: Mechanical engineer, National Instruments, 2006-present

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I favor the hybrid system with six single-member districts, two or four at large seats and a mayor. This provides each district with a representative that is directly accountable to their area, while at the same time having at-large members who must focus on the greater good of the whole city. This way we can hopefully cut back on some of the problems that arise from single member districts, such as “ward” politics, “pork barrel” projects, etc. Given that the city charter can only be amended every two years and that the “Stop Domain Subsidies” amendment will be on the November ballot, we must act quickly to get this on the ballot.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

Incentives should be used to help local businesses and businesses that improve the quality of life of all citizens. One example of the latter is a business that implements major energy, water or trash reduction policies. We cannot be handing out subsidies to national retail chain stores that do not benefit the entire population. Austin has many attributes that will attract larger national businesses without subsidies, namely access to the University of Texas technology incubator, a rapidly growing population and a highly intelligent workforce.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

Long-term planning is at the core of my entire platform. So the first thing I would do is to create a long-term comprehensive plan for the city. The Austin Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan has not been updated in over 25 years. The increased size of the city and the massive changes in technology over that time practically make the old plan obsolete. We need to be thorough in the new plan and we must consider long term — up to 30-plus years. This will allow us to keep the overriding things we love about this town intact as the town grows. All of my other platform items — becoming the most biker-friendly city in the country, developing a world-class mass-transportation system, intelligent urban planning and becoming the premier green technology city — all would come directly from this plan.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The city should build affordable housing everywhere that it can, but it needs to do so intelligently. My long term vision for this city is localized communities and neighborhoods which are walkable and bikable, complete with parks and shopping. The residents would work, live and play in relative proximity to each other. This would reduce traffic congestion and pollution and would have a positive influence on quality of life. To achieve this vision, we need to have a mix of affordable housing and market-valued housing in each community. I think the city needs to focus first on making the maximum impact, and that would be in neighborhoods around downtown. More people work and play in the downtown area than any other single section of town. Thus, it makes sense to start in the areas with the greatest impact.

Lee Leffingwell

X00211_7.JPG

Web site: www.voteleffingwell.com

Age: 68

Occupation: Council member

Education: Bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from University of Texas; Naval Aviation Officer Candidate School in Pensacola, Florida

Experience: Council member, 2005-present; chairman of Austin’s environmental board, 1999-2004; Delta Air Lines pilot, 1967-99; commander in U.S. Navy and reserves, 1962-82

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I personally support a change to a mixed system that includes both district representatives and at-large representatives. I believe a mixed system could help improve our system of government overall by ensuring that citizens have representatives who are from their area of town and who have an intimate understanding of the ongoing issues and concerns in that area, while also preserving a broader, citywide perspective on the City Council. More important than my personal position is my support for giving Austin citizens the opportunity to vote on the issue.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

In my view, incentives should only be considered when they facilitate the creation of real, lasting jobs in preferred industries and when the city is able to verify, preferably through a third party, that the recipients of incentives are in fact meeting their obligations under the agreed-upon terms of the package. My priorities for targeted industries to consider for employer incentives include renewable energy, health sciences and digital entertainment. I strongly oppose incentives for retail-based projects, and testified as a private citizen (before being elected to the City Council) against the Domain subsidies package. As a council member, I sponsored a successful amendment to the city’s economic development policies that prohibits future retail-based incentive packages.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

My top budget priority is and always has been the provision of reliable, basic city services, including road and infrastructure maintenance, solid waste services, code enforcement and permitting, public safety, public health, parks, and libraries. As a council member, I believe my primary responsibility is to make well-informed, responsible budgeting decisions (not just at budget time, but year-round) in order to keep our tax rate as low as it can possibly be, while at the same time ensuring that the city is meeting its most fundamental obligation to deliver reliable basic services that help maintain our quality of life.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas? The city should be working to deliver affordable housing in every part of our community. To accomplish that, I will work to maximize the impact of the 2006 voter-approved housing bond funds, continue to support the city’s SMART Housing Program, and ensure that affordable housing options are a part of all transit-oriented development districts and city projects, such as the redevelopment of the Green Water Treatment Plant site downtown. Additionally, I support providing tax increment financing to our Affordable Housing Trust Fund, applicable to redevelopment projects like Green, to provide an ongoing source of revenue for affordable housing strategies and to help the city continue to buy down new affordable units citywide.

Jason Meeker

M5X00124_7.JPG

Web site: www.jasonforaustin.com

Age: 38

Occupation: Founder of Jason Meeker Communications, a freelance advertising and public relations firm

Education: Bachelor’s degree in journalism, University of Texas

Experience: Founder of Jason Meeker Communications, 1998-2008; senior copywriter, Sicola Martin advertising firm, 1997-98

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I would vote for a district-based system that offers a more responsive city government. I would prefer a hybrid of at-large and single members, but the level of public discussion has not been seriously undertaken to improve or change our government. The public should always have an opportunity to decide on such matters, but the discourse has not or is not happening. I also propose the creation of a new office called Office of Public Advocate. That person would be an ombudsman, or go-between, for the citizens and city government. The council members would still answer to citizens and respond to their requests. But the Public Advocate could answer complaints about problems with city government, investigate ineffective programs, and propose solutions to make government more efficient.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

Austin, along with all major cities, competes for businesses on a national level. Incentives are appropriate for employers who participate in the community with respect to our sensitive environment. Reasonable incentives should be available to employers who do not put demands on our overburdened services. For instance, no employer should be able to qualify for incentives unless it provides health care benefits to its employees. We should make incentives available only to businesses that qualify as active community partners. I also want to address Austin’s need for a sound economic roadmap. Whether or not to offer incentives, and what excludes such consideration, should be part of Austin’s economic plan.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

My top priority will to place Austin on a sound economic roadmap. Let’s look beyond the next fiscal year or two. What kind of economy do we need to build now in order to have the kind of city we want in five, 10 or 20 years? What can we do now to stabilize property taxes and ensure we aren’t overtaxed in the future? I don’t think these questions are being asked or addressed at an acceptable level.
As a council member, I will work to create and implement Austin’s much-needed economic policy. This is vital to managing growth.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

We need to examine the costs and benefits. For example, what are the needs of citizens and families in affordable housing? Do they need to be near schools? Is there a stable job base nearby? Are their special transit needs to get people to the places where they would be employed?

Let’s also recognize that Austin made a contract with its citizens to encourage dense downtown development and to discourage sprawl over environmentally sensitive areas. I am critical that we have sold access to public property downtown to the highest bidder. As a consequence, we are allowing housing downtown that only very wealthy people can afford. It is unacceptable to continue selling city assets and excluding the majority of citizens from the benefits. The average price of a new condo downtown is $820 per square foot! Using city land for a better purpose, such as affordable housing, should be a higher priority.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

Place 4 City Council Candidate Q & A

We posed a series of questions to candidates for all the Austin City Council races. Early voting starts April 28 for the May 10 municipal election.

Here are the answers from Place 4 candidates Robin Cravey, Jennifer Gale, Cid Galindo, Laura Morrison, Sam Osemene and Ken Vasseau.

Robin Cravey

M5X00076_7.JPG

Web site: www.robincravey.com

Age: 56

Occupation: Lawyer, sole practitioner of the Law Office of Robin Theobald Cravey

Education: Bachelor’s degree in American studies; law degree, University of Texas at Austin

Experience: Executive assistant for former Council Members Daryl Slusher and Max Nofziger 1995-98; law clerk for Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund, 1994-95; sole proprietor of MacPages publication production company, 1988-92; editor of Onion Creek Free Press, 1981-82; taxi driver for Roy’s Taxi, 1970-81; founder of Friends of Barton Springs Pool, 2006-07; director of Austin Bar Association, 2004-05; member of the Austin Planning Commission, 1999-2001; president of Zilker Neighborhood Association, 1998-99, 2003-04; editor and publisher of Tilted Planet Press, 1982-1986; convention delegate for Texas Democratic Party, 1988 and 2006

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I favor a mixed system of representation, with some council members elected at-large (citywide), and some elected from individual districts. This will allow the district-elected council members to have a closer relationship to the voters who elect them. It will also lower the cost of city council election campaigns and make it a realistic possibility for citizens who are not independently wealthy to run for a place on the Austin City Council. This has been on the ballot a half dozen times over the past 30 years. I voted for it every time, and it failed every time. I would not like to put it on the ballot again unless we have a good indication that the people will support it.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

Let’s define incentives to employers. A local bicycle shop is an employer just as important as a semiconductor manufacturer, though not on the same scale, of course. The city can and does offer many kinds of incentives, including management and personnel training, favorable zoning, infrastructure improvements, fee waivers, utility rate discounts, and low-interest loans. The city also offers tax rebates, which are a source of much consternation. Without saying never, I believe these tax rebates violate the principle of fair and equal taxation, and I do not support them. The reasons to offer incentives are to persuade an employer to behave in a way that is favored by city policy, or to develop our economy in specific ways. So, for example, incentives are appropriate to encourage employers to conserve resources, to hire more workers, or to locate in the desired development zone.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

I believe we need a common sense budget. I learned the budget process from Betty Dunkerley when she was city finance director and I was a council aide. It’s complicated. New council members often struggle through the first budget cycle before they can get their feet on the ground. Few citizens ever get a clear understanding of it. On the council, I will work to make the budget more straightforward and flexible. In the next budget, it will be important for us to hold down the cost of our public safety contracts so that we can increase funding to our human services and quality-of-life departments. Public safety is important, and we fund it well, but our parks, libraries, and human services have been underfunded, and we must bring them up to the excellence the city deserves.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The city must distribute affordable housing throughout. We will act on opportunities to create reasonably priced housing in the neighborhoods near downtown, but I will not write off downtown as a place where working people live. We must have homes for working people in all parts of the city, if we are to transform the way the city functions. Our goal should be a city where people walk or bike to work, or ride transit, not one where they get on the highway for an hour or two or three every day. We should create a city where working people have time for their kids, not one where our inner-city schools are threatened by under-enrollment.

X00066_7.JPG

Jennifer Gale

Age: 47

Occupation: Unemployed

Could not be reached.

Cid Galindo

M5X00192_7.JPG

Web site: www.cidgalindo.com

Age: 44

Occupation: President, Galindo Group Austin, urban planning and green building firm

Education: Bachelor’s degree in economics, Texas A&M University; master’s degrees in Latin American Studies and business administration, University of Texas

Experience: President, Galindo Group Austin, 1995-present; organizer and director, Texas Enterprise Bank, which specializes in management oversight and business strategy, 2004-present; co-founder of Lost Hero Productions, which produces historical documentary films, 2003-present; co-founder of Teaching Innovations, which distributes technology-based reading products, 1997-2003; president of Aerofit Health and Fitness Clubs, 1989-99

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

Although a single-member district measure has failed to pass six times in the past, voters deserve a full conversation and another chance to decide whether we’ve finally outgrown our current system. I support a well-reasoned discussion to establish the parameters of what a new system would look like, and then putting it on the ballot at the earliest opportunity, because frankly, I am not sure what the best answer is myself. Until we can come to a consensus on district-based government, however, I propose taking a look at sector-based management — re-organizing all or most of our city departments into the geographic management sectors, following our current police department sectors. My proposal would feature one neighborhood ombudsman, or advocate, for each sector to serve as the citizen contact for all the city departments in that sector. This would create the precedent of allocating city resources according to a common-sense geographical formula, just as a district-based form of government would.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

First we should be clear that incentives are not subsidies. A subsidy implies that there is no financial return for a taxpayer-funded investment, and in the pursuit of economic development, we should never do that — period. But incentives do have an expected rate of return, and we should use them to engage in public/private partnerships that can help us achieve our goals as a city. We must first, however, change our attitude about large employers because they can be responsible partners in building a great city with high-quality jobs and the economic vitality that helps our small local businesses grow. They also help create the tax base that allows us to maintain our roads, build our libraries, and protect our parks. We have to be thoughtful about the companies we partner with; we must include strict performance measures and penalties for failing to meet them. Additionally, I will propose that they include a land use component, so that the majority of employees of any centralized facility have the option of living within walking distance from work in a home they can afford.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

I believe that the greatest danger to our city’s quality of life is our failure to plan for the future. Our Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 1979. It is no wonder we are choking in our own traffic congestion, paying higher taxes, and standing by as our water quality degrades. My top priority is to engage the voters in a concerted effort to come together behind a vision for our city. Only in the context of a new Comprehensive Plan can we really have a responsible discussion about budget priorities. As a Planning Commissioner, I worked with fellow commissioners to create a growth management framework that calls for the creation of seven major town centers along the eastern perimeter of the city and a transfer of development rights mechanism that would discourage development over the acquifer.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

I believe we should focus on developing affordable housing downtown, but it has to be on less expensive tracts that are limited in height by capitol view corridors, using stick-frame construction that costs much less than concrete and steel, and it should be expedited through the city’s processes. Our second objective should be to distribute our supply of affordable housing throughout the city. It’s important that all working families — public safety officers, classroom teachers, nurses, small business owners — to be able to afford to live in the city they serve, and reasonably close to the place they work. That also helps with traffic congestion, carbon emissions, and overall quality of life.

Laura Morrison

M5X00230_7.JPG

Website: www.lauraforaustin.com

Age: 53

Occupation: Community preparedness and disaster management consultant

Education: Bachelor’s degree in mathematics, University of California at Berkeley; master’s degree in mathematics, University of California at San Diego; graduate certificate, School of Public Health, Community Preparedness and Disaster Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Experience: Consultant in Disaster Management, Texas Interfaith/Interagency Disaster Response, 2007; consultant to Lockheed Martin International Business Office, 1996-2003; engineer and project manager for Lockheed Martin, 1985-96; Austin Neighborhoods Council president, 2006-07; ANC vice president for zoning, 2005; Community Council of the Community Action Network member, 2007-present; Single-Family Residential Development Regulations Task Force co-chair, 2006-present; Commercial Design Standards Task Force member, 2005-07; Housing Works policy subcommittee member, 2007-present; Old West Austin Neighborhood Plan Team co-chair, 2005-07; West End Austin Alliance board member, 2004-present; Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, 1999-present

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

Austin’s form of government has resulted in a lack of representation and accountability for some residents of our city. A change to a hybrid system (a combination of at-large or sector, and single-member districts) would bring the following benefits: increased accountability of council members; better understanding by the council of the issues facing citizens; lower cost of running a campaign; encouraging a broader range of candidates; enhanced access to council members by the citizens; and potentially increased voter turnout. We need additional community dialogue and further study to develop the specifics of an optimal proposal to take to the voters. With adequate focus and effort this can be ready to take to the voters by November.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

Incentives for businesse can be appropriate if there is an adequate return on that investment in terms of community benefit. However, incentive decisions, as with any investment, must consider a total cost-benefit analysis and I support a requirement for such an analysis. We must be clear to use incentives only when they fit our community’s goals; would not be developing here in the open market otherwise; and are not detrimental to our existing businesses. Any incentive agreement must be dependent on well-defined, measurable performance that is reported publicly on a regular basis.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

As a project manager for Lockheed Martin, I had responsibility for a multi-million dollar program and understand the challenges of balancing a budget. Assuming that public safety is effectively addressed in the budget, my priority would be to better address the root causes of social ills that end up costing us more in the long run and to ensure that there are proportionate city resources in all parts of town.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

There are many benefits to our community to ensuring that there is mix of housing in all parts of town, including downtown, the central city and outlying areas. Ensuring affordability will help seniors stay in their neighborhoods as they age and could allow their children to stay in the neighborhoods they grew up in as young adults. Affordable housing downtown could help downtown and state employees work closer to their jobs, which would help decrease congestion. There are opportunities to build less expensive housing downtown with appropriate use of city-owned land, partnerships with the state in redeveloping state-owned parking garages, and mid-rise housing on properties in the Capitol View Corridor, as was suggested by ROMA Design Group in the recent Downtown Plan.

Sam Osemene

M5X00148_7.JPG

Web site: www.vote4alonghorn.com

Age: 34

Occupation: Parole officer, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Education: Bachelor’s degree in political science, University of Texas; will graduate this May with a master’s degree in political science from Texas State University

Experience: Parole officer, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 2006-2008; security officer, 1995-98; post office deliveryman, 1994-96; Navy seaman, 1992-94

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

I support the idea of single-member districts. The at-large system is not representational. Many parts of the city are marginalized and have no voice in policy decisions. Single-member districts promote accountability, proportional representation, reduce the influence of lobbyists, make it less expensive to conduct elections and run for office and enhance transparency. The issue should be put on the ballot in November.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers?

The best incentive the city of Austin can give to employers is to reduce taxes and end corporate subsidies that have put many local businesses out of business and ballooned the deficit. Local businesses should be promoted by giving businesses the same opportunity to compete without guaranteeing equal outcome.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

Balanced budget. The City of Austin has not had a balanced budget in many years. We can achieve this by cutting taxes and embracing fiscal responsibility.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The City of Austin should encourage the private sector to invest in affordable housing in different parts of the city. One of the reasons we are in this quagmire is because of the belief that government is the answer to every issue. The best government is the one that governs the least. The goal of the council is to set policies.

Ken Vasseau

M5X00056_7.JPG

Web site: www.myspace/kvaustincitycouncil.com

Age: 53

Occupation: Real estate agent

Education: Real estate license

Experience: Real estate agent, 2005-present; retail sales at Dilliards and others stores, 2000-05; owner of an antiques business, 1994-2000

1) Do you think Austin should change to a districts-based form of government? Why or why not? And should that issue be put on the November ballot?

Yes, I do think we need to have single-member districts. It’s hard to represent the entire city. When you’re running for council, you have to run all over the city, and it’s a daunting task to cover the whole town.

2) Under what circumstances, if any, should the city offer incentives to employers? I don’t think we should offer any incentives to employers.

3) What would be your one, top budget priority?

One of the most important things is what are we going to do with our landfills. That is going to be a huge issue, because the landfills are going to have to be mined out and cleaned out. Landfill operators try to maximize their profits, but the city has to handle the landfills in the end. We will be left with a mess.

4) Should the city focus more on developing affordable housing downtown or in outlying areas?

The focus should be on outlying areas because downtown, it is a market-based issue…. the market is going to tell the tale on this. It seems like the downtown area.. there is a lot of interest downtown. So it will almost be impossible to put up affordable housing in the downtown area… we’ll have to focus on affordalbe housing n the outlying areas.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 9, 2008

Responsible Growth takes a (surprise!) vote

Before the Responsible Growth for Northcross City Council candidate forum on Tuesday, organizers said they had a trick up their sleeves to keep people engaged until the end of the event.

Turns out, the surprise was a informal poll of the audience. The neighborhood group, formed to oppose a Wal-Mart Supercenter at Northcross Mall, did not make any endorsements after more than 2 hours spent quizzing candidates on neighborhood and development issues.

The more than 100 people who attended received ballots with the 10 participating candidates’ names on them. (Two other candidates, Ken Vasseau and Jennifer Gale, attended but were not invited to speak.)

Jason Meeker carried the Place 1 race with 87 percent of informal votes cast, but no surprise there, seeing as he’s Responsible Growth’s spokesman. Incumbent Lee Leffingwell garnered support from 8 percent of attendees and Allen Demling won 5 percent of the vote.

In the Place 3 race, incumbent Jennifer Kim nabbed 54 percent of the votes, followed by Ken Weiss with 27 percent and Randi Shade with 19 percent.

Laura Morrison was the favorite in Place 4 — the race to replace Betty Dunkerley — with 72 percent of the votes cast. Robin Cravey picked up 19 percent and while 6 percent cast votes for Cid Galindo. Sam Osemene rounded out the race with 3 percent.

Permalink | Comments (11) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 8, 2008

Responsible Growth for Northcross forum tonight

Leading to the May 10 City Council elections, everybody from bicycling advocates to real estate groups, wants to hear from and quiz the candidates.

Tonight, it’s Responsible Growth for Northcross, a neighborhood group that has opposed plans for a Wal-Mart at the mall, that will do the grilling. The forum is set for 7 p.m. at the Ben Hur Shrine Temple at 7811 Rockwood Lane. Seating is available for the first 250 people who show up.

In a press release this morning, organizers promised a “lively and engaging evening” with 10 of the 12 council candidates addressing neighborhood issues, accountability and oversight, and the Big Box ordinance.

Candidates were given some of the questions in advance to give candidates time to prepare “in hopes of avoiding the usual fluff and canned phrases one usually hears at these events,” the press release said.

The night could be particularly contentious for the Place 1 race, featuring incumbent Lee Leffingwell and Jason Meeker, a member of Responsible Growth for Northcross. Allen Demling, the third candidate in that race, will also be there.

“The still-angry Northcross neighbors are not likely to tolerate the same speeches they have been hearing since March,” the press release said. “And, not to be boring, RG4N will have a trick up its sleeve to keep the crowd interested and in their seats until the bitter end.”

Kat Correa, a board member for the organization, said there was no telling in advance what the trick is. The event is expected to last a couple hours.

Permalink | Comments (7) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

April 1, 2008

City Council or roller derby? Tough choice.

Randi Shade got into the spirit of April Fool’s Day with a press release announcing that she’s ditching her City Council campaign to pursue a career in women’s roller derby.

“I’ve thought long and hard about this,” she wrote. “I believe my broad experience as a public servant, a successful businesswoman, and a non-profit executive make me a great candidate to lead the Hell Marys” team.

Can you blame her? Roller derby seems like a heck of a lot more fun than sitting through City Council meetings.

Shade continued her kidding: “A big part of my decision … was my realization at breakfast this morning that Jennifer Kim has been one of the best council members in Austin’s history.”

“From giving Las Manitas restaurant a $750,000 forgivable loan to fighting relentlessly for the rights of dogs to eat out, Jennifer Kim’s record speaks for itself, and if anything I think she deserves to be elected mayor.”

On the campaign trail, Shade has knocked Kim for not being an accessible enough council member and for making bad policy decisions. The dogs-eating-out jab is a reference to a policy Kim championed two years ago to allow leashed dogs on restaurant patios.

Permalink | Comments (36) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

March 27, 2008

ANC grills council candidates

The Austin Neighborhoods Council held its annual City Council candidate forum last night, and woe to the candidates who showed up unprepared.

At most council forums, candidates field fairly general questions about their stances on things such as toll roads and the environment.

But ANC dug down into the details and grilled the candidates on specific points, ranging from their stances on individual zoning cases to whether they would reduce the decibel-level of noise that live music venues can emit into nearby neighborhoods.

Another refrain: How would they beef up the power of neighborhood plans, the land-use plans that neighborhoods spend years crafting but that council members sometimes ignore as they make zoning decisions?

A few candidates were clearly out of their league; Place 1 candidate and amateur beard-grower Allen Demling fessed up early on that he probably wouldn’t have detailed answers for every question he was asked.

And Place 1 candidate Jason Meeker got a laugh when he said he didn’t know the length of his area’s neighborhood plan but had just printed it out the night before.

“It’s several megabytes,” he said.

After closed-door deliberations, the ANC endorsed no candidate in Place 1, incumbent Jennifer Kim in Place 3 and former ANC president Laura Morrison in Place 4.

Permalink | Comments (17) | Post your comment Categories: Council elections

March 18, 2008

BATPAC endorses Meeker, Morrison

The Better Austin Today Political Action Committee has endorsed Jason Meeker in the Place 1 City Council race and Laura Morrison in Place 4.

The group did not endorse any of the Place 3 candidates — incumbent Jennifer Kim, Randi Shade and Kenneth Weiss — saying that none of them had received more than 60 percent in a vote by its members.

The “BATPAC” (betcha can’t say it ten times fast!) is comprised of folks from different groups representing interests such as the environment and small businesses.

“Winning our endorsement requires candidates to go beyond appealing to a single constituency or limited area of city policy,” said Randall Terrell of the Cherrywood neighborhood during a noon press conference.

The candidates had to submit lengthy questionnaires and be interviewed to be considered for the endorsement.

Meeker — a member of the group Responsible Growth for Northcross, which has opposed plans for a North Austin Wal-Mart — is “exactly what Austin needs to counter the insider mentality and special interest domination at City Hall,” Terrell said.

Meeker’s opponents are Allen Demling and Place 1 incumbent Lee Leffingwell.

Morrison “is best known for her stellar service as the president of the Austin Neighborhoods Council, where she consistently demonstrated sound judgment, a keen intellect, deep respect for differing opinions, and a willingness to fight tenaciously for policies that protect Austin’s environment and neighborhoods,” Terrell said.

The other Place 4 opponents — vying to replace Betty Dunkerley — are Robin Cravey, Cid Galindo, Sam Osemene, Jennifer Gale and Ken Vasseau.

Permalink | Comments (28) | Categories: Council elections

February 6, 2008

Meeker taking on City Hall

Neighborhoods across Austin will have a “guy on the inside,” Jason Meeker said at a news conference Wednesday, if he is elected to the City Council Place 1 seat.

Best known as the spokesman for the Responsible Growth for Northcross, Meeker said at a news conference that he is taking on City Hall and its “insiders.”

“I’m running because if something like this happens to your neighborhood or to your small business, you’ll need a friend in City Hall who can help you,” Meeker said, referring to his neighborhood’s fight against Wal-Mart at Northcross Mall.

Meeker is challenging incumbent Lee Leffingwell and Allen Demling.

Aside from neighborhood concerns about development, the only other issue Meeker discussed at the news conference was Leffingwell’s position on nuclear power.

Meeker claimed Leffingwell supported nuclear power, based on an American-Statesman editorial in September.

Leffingwell disputes that contention and plans to oppose joining in the expansion of the South Texas Project. The City Council will take up an item next week regarding the expansion of the Matagorda County nuclear plant, of which Austin is a minority owner.

Below is the complete text of the editorial: The City of Austin is quietly considering whether it should invest in the proposed $6 billion expansion of the nuclear power plant at the South Texas Project near Bay City. And City Council Member Lee Leffingwell is right to defend that consideration - though he and other city leaders no doubt will hear loud and angry objections.

NRG Energy Inc., a New Jersey company, plans to build two nuclear reactors at the existing South Texas Project. Austin owns 16 percent of the two existing nuclear reactors at the plant, and they supply about 30 percent of the electricity used by Austin Energy customers every year.

It’s much too soon to endorse Austin’s participation in the expansion project; there are a lot of questions to be answered, particularly regarding the firmness of that $6 billion cost estimate.

That said, Leffingwell - as staunch an environmental advocate as any - is right to argue that Austin must consider buying into the two new reactors to meet future energy needs.

“It’s something we’re going to have to make a decision on next year, and I think we have to give it serious consideration,” Leffing-

well said Thursday.

“I know Austin Energy is going to be taking a serious look at it,” Leffingwell said, “and they will evaluate the cost factors and safety problems, and I think we do have to realize that the plant is going to be on the ground whether or not we participate.”

San Antonio, whose municipal utility also owns part of the South Texas Project, is investing in the expansion, and the Lower Colorado River Authority, which supplies power to much of Central Texas outside of Austin, is in serious talks with NRG over both coal and nuclear plant investments.

Longtime residents will remember how Austin’s original 16 percent share in the South Texas Project was supposed to cost $161 million but ended up costing ratepayers $1 billion. But this, too, should be known: Austin Energy reports that of the $350 million a year its spends on fuel for power plants, only 4 percent, or about $14 million, is spent on nuclear fuel.

NRG’s application for federal permits is likely to be approved. Congress has encouraged development of nuclear power plants with taxpayer-backed insurance guarantees and production tax credits. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees such plants, has kept open arms to the industry, though no company has filed for a permit since the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania in 1979.

But memories of that accident, in which no one was injured or died, have faded, and many environmental and consumer groups are now as alarmed about the construction of coal-fired power plants as they are nuclear ones.

Just this year the mayor of Dallas led a campaign to block Texas Utilities from building 11 coal-fired power plants. The principal argument against them was that they would make it too difficult for Texas to meet federal clean air standards. Another objection was that they would make a bad global warming problem even worse. Both concerns - air pollution and global warming - apply to Austin as well.

Nuclear power has its own problems with radioactive waste, but at least that waste is isolated and guarded, not pumped into the air we breathe or the climate we live in.

Environmentalists are beginning to argue that Texas can get by without adding nuclear or coal-fired plants. Instead, they say, we could rely on a rigorous program of energy efficiency, conservation, wind and solar power sources and natural gas-fired power plants.

But it’s doubtful that most Texans, including most Austin Energy customers, want to risk their economic well-being - and air conditioning - on energy efficiency programs and wind turbines.

As Leffingwell notes, the issue isn’t whether to build the two nuclear reactors; it’s whether Austin should participate. Austin should seriously consider it.

Permalink | Comments (7) | Categories: Council elections

February 1, 2008

Meeker jumping into Place 1 race

Responsible Growth for Northcross spokesman Jason Meeker said on Friday he will challenge incumbent Lee Leffingwell for the Place 1 City Council seat.

Meeker had been signaling for months that he planned to run but filed the paperwork Friday to begin fund raising. A formal announcement is planned for next week.

RG4N has been fighting the city’s approval of a Wal-Mart at the North Austin mall and recently lost a court battle over the approval.

Engineer and competitive beard grower Allen Demling is also running for the Place 1 seat.

Permalink | Comments (23) | Categories: Council elections

January 23, 2008

Firefighters fire back

The Austin Firefighters Association was not pleased with Council Member Jennifer Kim’s response to their endorsement of her opponent on Tuesday.

Association President Stephen Truesdell made their displeasure abundantly clear in a statement issued Wednesday.

Kim blamed her refusal to back a pension increase for the firefighters’ decision to withdraw their support of her.

Not true, Truesdell said. The pension issue was not discussed as part of the candidates’ interviews and is just one of the association’s many concerns, he said.

“To be crystal clear, Jennifer Kim did not lose our support because of her unwillingness or inability to help firefighters with any one issue,” Truesdell said in a statement. “She lost our support because of an overall failure of leadership over 2 1/2 years.”

The firefighters, who joined with the other two public safety unions to endorse Randi Shade in the Place 3 race, were key supporters of Kim in 2005.

Below is Truesdell’s statement in its entirety:

“In response to our PAC’s endorsement of Place 3 challenger Randi Shade, Council Member Jennifer Kim has said that her refusal to support funding for the Firefighters pension cost her our endorsement for re-election.

“This is an untrue and unfortunate statement. Our endorsement of Randi Shade was based on Kim’s poor overall performance on public safety issues over the last 2 1/2 years, and our belief that Shade can and will do a better job.

“We take no delight in withdrawing our past support of Kim. We backed her enthusiastically in 2005 because we believed then that she could be an effective leader on public safety issues, and for the community at large.

“We were mistaken. As constituents, we’ve found Jennifer Kim to be not only unwilling to take the time to fully understand the challenges we face, but also unable to work with the rest of the City Council to get anything done.

“With regard to the pension fund, our PAC board never once asked any candidate we interviewed about it, including Jennifer Kim. Addressing the pension’s unfunded liability is a concern, but only one of many.

“To be crystal clear, Jennifer Kim did not lose our support because of her unwillingness or inability to help firefighters with any one issue, she lost our support because of an overall failure of leadership over 2 1⁄2 years.

“We think Randi Shade is different. Randi offers a proven track record of working well with people in Austin to get positive things done. We believe she can be a strong leader on public safety, and on other big issues.

“The Austin Firefighters Association PAC is proud to stand together with the Austin Police Association PAC and the Austin-Travis County EMS Employees Association PAC to endorse Randi Shade for Austin City Council Place 3.”

Permalink | Comments (7) | Categories: Council elections

January 22, 2008

Robin Rather endorses Kim

Environmental activist and Liveable City member Robin Rather said this morning that she’s endorsing Council Member Jennifer Kim in Kim’s May re-election bid.

“I did not endorse Jennifer the first time she ran, but her record the last three years has impressed me,” Rather wrote in an e-mail announcement. “She is an independent voice on the council, and she calls it like she sees it.”

Kim ruffled some feathers Thursday, when she was the only council member who abstained from the vote to appoint Marc Ott Austin’s next city manager. She faces a tough challenger in the May elections — Internet entrepreneur Randi Shade, who has already raised slightly more money.

“Though I’ve known Jennifer’s opponent for many years and she’s a nice person, she simply doesn’t have the expertise or track record we need,” Rather wrote. “When the big votes were going down at City Hall, I don’t recall ever seeing her there lending her voice for progressive issues.”

Rather praised Kim for opposing a toll-road plan and a Wal-Mart planned for Northcross Mall.

Permalink | Comments (8) | Categories: Council elections

January 11, 2008

Leffingwell campaign launch Tuesday

Council Member Lee Leffingwell will launch his re-election campaign Tuesday, Jan. 15, at Nuevo Leon Restaurant, 1501 E. Sixth Street beginning at 5:30 p.m.

More information is available at info@voteleffingwell.com or by calling Matt at 923-2673.

Permalink | Comments (13) | Categories: Council elections

January 8, 2008

Newly formed PAC calls for more government accountability

As the City Council began its first round of interviews of candidates seeking to be Austin’s next city manager, a newly formed political action committee called for more government accountability at a press conference today.

The group, Better Austin Today, which is made up of a range of community activists representing environmental, business and other interests, held the press conference at City Hall to announce its goals and ask for community support.

“Our government here on the local level has been hijacked by private interests, by the developers,” said neighborhood activist Daniel Llanes, a member of the group’s board of directors. “We want elected officials that are going to listen to the people, not to special interests.”

The group maintains that city officials continually have failed to listen to public input and listed concerns ranging from air and water quality to rising costs of living.

“It’s time for city government to start listening to the people,” said board member Roy Waley, a local real estate agent and vice chairman of the executive committee for Sierra Club’s Austin Regional Group. “It’s time for us to stop working separately and start working together.”

The group intends to endorse candidates in the May election and is considering making contributions to the campaigns of whomever they endorse.

“We need elected officials who respect the ideas and desire of the community,” said board member Hope Morrison, co-founder and president of Responsible Growth for Northcross. “What brings us together is a common love for Austin and a shared view that City Hall has lost its way.”

The City Council is meeting privately today and Wednesday with candidates seeking to replace retiring City Manager Toby Futrell. The council has not announced any opportunities for the public to meet the candidates.

When asked whether the conference was purposely timed to coincide with the city manager interviews, Morrison said it was merely “serendipity.”

“The universe may be trying to tell the city something,” she said.

Better Austin Today will hold a fundraiser from 6 to 9 p.m. Sunday at the Austin Moose Lodge, 2103 E.M. Franklin Ave., between East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Manor Road.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Categories: Council elections

January 7, 2008

New political action committee mobilizing

The new political action committee that was the focus of a story in Saturday’s Austin American-Statesman will hold a press conference at noon Tuesday at City Hall.

The committee, Better Austin Today, also is holding a fundraiser from 6 to 9 p.m. on Sunday at Austin Moose Lodge, 2103 E.M. Franklin Ave., between East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Manor Road.

The committee plans to pull support from neighborhood groups, environmental and civil rights activists, social and environmental justice groups, and the small-business and local business communities.

Board members come from some of the city’s most politically active organizations: the Austin Neighborhoods Council, Save Our Springs Alliance, Sierra Club in Austin, the Central Texas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and Responsible Growth for Northcross.

Wanting change from elected city leaders, the committee will endorse City Council candidates in the May election, when three seats will be on the ballot.

Permalink | Comments (5) | Categories: Council elections

November 15, 2007

Kim council campaign kicking off

Council Member Jennifer Kim will launch her re-election campaign Dec. 5 at Stubb’s, 801 Red River St., from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m.

Kim faces a challenge from Randi Shade, an Internet entrepreneur and former University of Texas student body president, for the Place 3 seat on the council.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Categories: Council elections

November 13, 2007

Shade launches Kim challenge

The Place 3 campaign for City Council is unlikely to get dull, if Randi Shade’s sharp words for incumbent Jennifer Kim are any indication.

Shade, an Internet entrepreneur and former UT student body president, told a crowd of more than 100 supporters at her campaign launch Tuesday evening that she would be more accessible, attentive and accountable than Kim.

And, she added: “I will be happy to stand in line with you at the airport.”

That situation, when Kim was said to be seeking special access to the airport, gets to the heart of the complaint that Kim is on the council for status and not to serve, Shade said. Kim has said the whole affair was a misunderstanding.

“I can’t help but feel that we can do better,” Shade said, noting that the community is often divided. “I’m somebody … who builds bridges. I pride myself on that.”

Attendees included Richard Franklin of the Black Austin Democrats; Austin Community College Trustee James McGuffee; Hill Country Conservancy director George Cofer; Joe Pinnelli of the Heritage Society of Austin; former Kim campaign manager Amy Everhart; political consultant David Butts (just observing, he said, but he is also a former part of the Kim camp) and representatives from the police and firefighters unions.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Categories: Council elections

It's official: Kim is running

Not that there was much suspense about Council Member Jennifer Kim seeking re-election, but she made her intention clear Tuesday morning with a news release.

“I understand the pressures growth is placing on the city and I will continue to fight to keep Austin affordable and to protect our quality of life,” Kim said in the release.

“I have a record of speaking out and voting on issues that are crucial to our quality of life,” said Kim, citing her opposition to the Northcross Wal-Mart plan and the water treatment plant site.

She also touts her work on affordable housing, issues affecting children and families, and her vote last month against the toll road plan.

Kim faces challenger Randi Shade for the Place 3 seat.

Permalink | Comments (27) | Categories: Council elections

November 12, 2007

Council kickoffs

With the dawning of City Council fund raising season this week, some candidates are emerging from their cubby holes for their official campaign kickoff events.

Place 3 challenger Randi Shade is having a gathering Tuesday at Nuevo Leon Restaurant, 1501 E. Sixth St., from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

Incumbent Jennifer Kim said last week that she plans to announce her candidacy on Tuesday with a news release but will not hold a kickoff event until later this month or early December.

For the open Place 4 seat, Robin Cravey, president of Friends of Barton Springs Pool, will host an event on Wednesday at Threadgill’s World Headquarters, 301 West Riverside Drive, from 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m.

Laura Morrison, former president of the Austin Neighborhoods Council, will follow on Thursday announcing her candidacy for the same seat. Morrison’s event will be at Threadgill’s from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

If there are other council election events, please let us know and we’ll post it here.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Categories: Council elections

October 29, 2007

Kim stakes out pro-golf position

The City of Austin does not want the University of Texas to redevelop the site of Lions Municipal Golf Course. That much has been known since January when City Manager Toby Futrell and Council Member Betty Dunkerley made a plea to save the golf course to the task force mulling the future of the Brackenridge tract.

Now, Council Member Jennifer Kim plans to make it official with a resolution on the Nov. 8 council agenda to oppose redevelopment of the site.

“UT is a vibrant part of the community, but we need to put a brake on any proposed development projects,” Kim said in a news release. “Lions Municipal Golf Course is a valued asset not just to the neighborhood but for all of Austin.”

The task force recommended commercial development for the 345-acre Brackenridge tract, located along the Colorado River and Lake Austin Boulevard, to earn money for the University of Texas. The UT System Board of Regents will hear public comments Nov. 9.

Kim, who is facing a tough re-election campaign, has been quite active with the pronouncements lately. She stood up with anti-nuke activists on Friday and hosted an affordable housing summit on Thursday.

Permalink | Comments (10) | Categories: Council elections

October 22, 2007

Place 3 getting crowded

A new challenger is joining Randi Shade in the race to unseat Council Member Jennifer Kim.

Ken Weiss, an MBA candidate with no political experience, released a statement today that he intended to run for Place 3. That campaign is shaping up to be a highly competitive race between the incumbent Kim and Shade, a well-connected challenger.

A former Texas Army National Guardsman, Weiss said he announced his candidacy a couple of days ago at a small gathering of family and friends. His supporters were elated, according to the release.

“I just think it is time to have someone on City Council that cares more about the city and its people than about themselves and big business,” Weiss said. “It is now time for someone to stand up for us citizens and help Austin strive for greatness.”

Permalink | | Categories: Council elections

October 18, 2007

Former political foe to run Kim's campaign

Political consultant Elliott McFadden is going to run the re-election campaign of Austin City Council Member Jennifer Kim.

The pairing is somewhat surprising, given that McFadden ran the campaign of Kim’s opponent, Margot Clarke, in 2005. But both Kim and McFadden said today that any ill will from the 2005 campaign is water under the bridge. They’re gearing up for a potentially tough fight this year against Internet entrepreneur Randi Shade, a former executive director of the Texas Commission on Volunteerism and Community Service under Gov. Ann Richards.

Meanwhile, Kim’s 2005 campaign manager, Amy Everhart, is endorsing Shade this time around, saying: “I had pretty high expectations of Jennifer” that Kim has not lived up to. Everhart now works for the ACLU, a group that’s opposing an ordinance that Kim has championed to crack down on panhandling.

McFadden, a former director of the Travis County Democratic Party, said he met with both Kim and Shade recently, and was “really impressed with Jennifer’s depth of knowledge and her understanding of the complex issues the city faces and that she is committed to bringing different parties together to gain consensus. I also think she’s the most consistent progressive voice on the council.”

He points to Kim’s recent vote against a toll-road plan and her work opposing a new Wal-Mart as examples of Kim’s strong leadership.

Some observers say Kim has not achieved enough on the dais and has embarrassed herself with a few well-publicized flaps, such as a dispute over preferential airport access.

“I think Jennifer has experienced a learning curve. She had a rough first year, because she was new,” McFadden said. “One thing that has impressed me is that she is willing to admit her mistakes.”

Permalink | Comments (6) | Categories: Council elections

October 10, 2007

David Butts reflects

Legendary political consultant David Butts weighed in Wednesday on what is shaping up to be the City Council race to watch.

Butts worked for Jennifer Kim in 2005 and helped establish the newcomer’s political legitimacy, so Austin’s political chatterati have been eagerly awaiting word on whether he will do so again.

His answer: I don’t know yet.

“I feel sort of ambivalent about it at the moment,” Butts said. “I’m not going to plunge into something that I’m ambivalent about.”

He credits Kim for making some difficult decisions, including her opposition to both the toll road plan and a water treatment plant.

“She’s got some support in some quarters that will hopefully stand up for her,” Butts said. “She’s got some heavy baggage to carry, too.”

Butts did make it clear that he will not work against Kim with Randi Shade’s campaign, which has drawn some major political players in town.

“I think she is viable,” Butts said of Kim. But, he added, that “she is in for a hard race, no surprise there.”

“Randi Shade will be a very, very tough candidate,” said Butts, who described Shade as a hardworking, honest and enlightened leader.

Butts, who was once described as the Tao of Austin politics, said the decision on whether to work for Kim hangs in the balance.

“I’m waiting for an epiphany,” he said, “something that makes me snap to.”

Permalink | | Categories: Council elections

October 8, 2007

Campaign aims to get Asian Americans to polls

Jennifer Kim’s re-election effort could get an extra boost from a campaign to drive 2008 Asian Americans to vote in the May 2008 city election.

If successful, the 2008 in 2008 campaign could almost double the number of Asian Americans who have voted in a local Austin election, said Ramey Ko, president of the Capital Area Asian American Democrats. The high point for Asian American voting was 2005 when Kim first sought the Place 3 seat.

Ko said the campaign aims to register new Asian American voters, emphasize the importance of voting in local elections and get them to the polls next May.

The “undeniable conclusion” is that the effort would benefit Kim, the first Asian American to serve on the Austin City Council, Ko said. But the objective is to help a community with low participation levels to understand the civic process better.

Kim does not have a monopoly on Asian American voters, he said. It is such a new community of voters that they are hungry for attention from any candidate who will take the time.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Categories: Council elections

October 5, 2007

Too few clash of ideas in Austin, veteran pol says

When veteran political consultant Peck Young speaks, you should listen. And not only for the entertainment value.

Young can turn a colorful phrase, indeed, but he also has decades of political experience. He believes Austin’s political system is fundamentally broken.

His primary gripe is about the “silly” campaign finance rules that limit contributions and prevent the candidates from running real campaigns about real differences on the issues, he said.

“That is wrong,” Young said. “It is not good government, it is not good democracy.”

Young also takes aim at the forums that serve as the primary means of campaigning. The forums are typically sponsored by a political group, a neighborhood association, or a community organization.

The groups invite all of the candidates for all of the City Council races on a single night to discuss their issue. It can get quite crowded with three or four races and typically three to five candidates — both contenders and not — in each race.

Each speaker has very little time to provide a nuanced response. The result is a sound bite campaign where there is little meaty debate, no “clash of ideas,” he said.

Young recommends not cramming all the races into a single night. He also suggests creating some sort of a fund raising threshold so that the debate is between the serious contenders. Such a move would not be politically correct, he said, but it would foster meaningful dialogue.

In Young’s mind, there is an opportunity to fix some of the problems in the system by creating single-member districts that will force candidates to focus on smaller constituencies and target their resources. Creating single-member districts might be on the ballot next May.

“That’s how you start dealing with this silly finance system,” Young said. “Then it stops being silly.”

With the campaign season creeping up on us, any ideas as to how to improve the political dialogue in Austin?

Permalink | Comments (2) | Categories: City Charter, Council elections

 
 

Nacogdoches News | Nacogdoches Weather | Sports | Life | Business News | Opinions | Classifieds | Sitemap
Nacogdoches Cars | Nacogdoches Real Estate | Nacogdoches Jobs

Copyright 2009 The Daily Sentinel. All rights reserved. - The Daily Sentinel

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policyAbout our ads
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ.