Subscribe to the News-Journal RSS Feed Mobile Access E-Newsletter Log In or Register as a New User 
Classifieds
Automotive
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise


Eubanks sentenced to 35 years after guilty plea
District attorney says plea deal reached after extended negotiations


The Daily Sentinel

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Accused murderer Tim Eubanks was sentenced to 35 years in prison Friday after pleading guilty to killing his wife, Tina, in December, 2006.

The sentence came just three days before Eubanks was to stand trial for the murder and several additional charges — one for indecency with a child and three for abandoning a child — which were dropped as part of a plea bargain with the district attorney's office.

Eubanks in a 2006 photograph.
 

"What we've done today is essentially assured that there is very little chance that Mr. Eubanks will ever get out of prison," District Attorney Stephanie Stephens said. "It's a 35 year sentence — the man is almost 39, I believe, that's a good lick in my opinion."

Stephens said the additional charges were dropped because the punishment to which Eubanks agreed carried more jail time than he would have received had he received the maximum sentence for the indecency and abandonment charges.

Shackled and dressed in the standard fluorescent orange jail jumpsuit, Eubanks told Judge Bascom Bentley that he was mentally competent and accepting of the plea. Bentley, a visiting judge from Anderson County, was standing in for 145th District Judge Campbell Cox, who was out of town at a conference.

Quiet and unemotional throughout the 10 minute hearing, he looked around the crowd while being escorted to the county jail, to await the completion of paperwork for transfer to prison.

New details about the incident released

The plea came after months of negotiations, said Stephens, who was free to speak about the case now that the gag order has been lifted.

Stephens said she had been adamant during negotiations that the sentence never go below 35 years, her "line in the sand."

Little has been made public about the case since the gag order was put in place, but Friday Stephens was able to speak about what she believes happened the December morning Tina Eubanks was murdered.

"My understanding from talking with Mrs. Eubanks' family is that there were some discord in their marriage, and evidently, there had been some discussion about a separation," Stephens said. "There were allegations that when the family lived in another state, one of the girls was molested by Mr. Eubanks, but that matter was not handled through law enforcement; instead, they chose to handle it privately and there was possibly some pressure from that incident leading up to the murder."

She further explained that after the couple's two oldest children left for school Dec. 13, 2006, Eubanks locked the door behind them, and sometime after that, strangled his wife.

"The two girls in the bedroom closest to the Eubanks' bedroom heard Mrs. Eubanks calling for their son Rich, saying 'help me'," Stephens said.

Minutes later, Eubanks came into their room, using duct tape to tie them up and to cover their mouths. He then went to the other side of the house where the other daughter was getting out of the shower and confronted her in that room.

"There was some contact between them, and at one point he put his mouth on her breast," she explained "(The daughter) told him she was going to tell her mother and (Eubanks) told her that her mother was gone."

According to the district attorney, Eubanks then bound her with the rest of the children before fleeing the home. He called several family members and friends telling them what he had done and asking for a "few minutes lead time" before they called the police.

The family's minivan was found at about 1:30 a.m. the following day, off Sutton Mill Road in the Littles Chapel Community near Chireno. Eubanks was found inside suffering from what appeared to be a drug overdose. He was transported to a Nacogdoches hospital for treatment, and subsequently arrested. He remained in the Nacogdoches County jail awaiting trial.

Why plea a case like this?

Tina Eubanks' brother, Timothy Kirby, called The Daily Sentinel Thursday expressing outrage at the plea, saying it was being made "100 percent against the family's wishes."

Stephens said part of her motivation for accepting a plea was to avoid having the children testify against their father.

"In making a decision to plea somebody like this, I have to weigh a number of things," Stephens said. "The most important thing in this case I had to weigh was putting young children who are emotionally fragile on the witness stand to confront somebody who was important in their life."

She said she was told the children had been having nightmares of Eubanks killing them.

"These children were dreading the prospect of having to testify, and when I have an instance where I can get somebody locked up for what I anticipate is going to be the rest of his life and save those children from having to undergo further trauma, it seems like a no-brainer to me," Stephens said.

Eubanks' attorney, John Heath Jr. said negotiations between his office and the district attorney have been going on for approximately six months, but finally reached the agreement Wednesday night.

"In criminal trials, it's really got to get close before people with interest on either side of the litigation come to the present realization of what is about to happen," Heath said. "I know that from Tim's perspective, he likewise, did not want to have to put those kids through that, in recognition of the fact that he's already put those kids through more than any kid should ever have to go through."

Stephens also mentioned that she felt the case was being "tried on punishment," meaning there was no doubt of his guilt, but it just came down to the sentencing.

"I have spoken with Tina Eubanks' father, and I don't want to say they are supporting this plea, his comments to me were that he understood my decision and respected my decision," Stephens said. "Obviously, there is nothing we can do that is going to make them feel whole again."

Rick Kirby, Tina Eubanks' father said the family believes "he got away with murder," but that he told Stephens that "she needs to do what she needs to do."

"I think if we walk out of here and both of us (Heath and Stephens) are somewhat dissatisfied, then we are probably in the right place," Stephens said of the decision Friday. "Do I think that Mr. Eubanks should serve more time? You bet, and to that extent I'm somewhat dissatisfied. But I don't think either one of us (either Heath or Stephens) will walk out of here today thinking we had a slam-dunk victory."

Defending Eubanks

Heath, Eubanks' attorney, said after the agreement was reached and the gag order lifted, that Eubanks "has been absolutely remorseful about this, and remains absolutely remorseful."

However, it was also Eubanks' remorse that made his case crumble.

Heath said he intended to raise the question of insanity in Eubanks' defense due to a combination of medications, including a migraine medication Topamax and his epilepsy.

"I do believe there are legitimate scientific reasons to think that either Topamax or epilepsy or some combination of those two factors can in fact cause psychotic episodes and cause people to do things they would never have done otherwise," Heath said. "I do not think, with any certainty, that a jury in this set of circumstances would have been persuaded of that."

He further explained that the legal definition of insanity in Texas includes that a person must not know what he or she is doing is wrong. Also, medical insanity or medical side effects wouldn't fit the definition.

That presented a problem, because when Eubanks called friends after the murder and told them what he had done, then fled and tried to commit suicide, it showed remorse — which was a sign that he recognized his wrongdoing.

"If he was remorseful and knew what he did was wrong, then it's not considered insanity," Heath said. "We kept finding ourselves in this circle that we couldn't get out of logically.

"It was difficult for me to say 'Tim, it is what is. And after all of this research that we have done, I haven't found a smoking gun that says I can prove to a jury that the reason you engaged in this bizarre conduct is more likely as a result of a severe mental defect to the extent that you did not know your conduct was wrong,'" Heath added.

Eubanks' attorney said he believed the medication, mixed with the bad decisions Eubanks made is what led to him "blowing up."

"It's my understanding that none of the allegations of either inappropriate contact with children or any of this came about until after Tim had an injury and subsequently became an epileptic"Heath said. "Now, is that a coincidence? What we know about epilepsy is that its an actual misfiring in the brain."

Case Closed

Now that Eubanks has pleaded guilty and has been sentenced, he will be sent to prison for a maximum of 35 years. While he will be eligible for parole after serving only half the sentence, Stephens said she is confident Eubanks will spend the rest of his life in prison.

"I think that we managed to come up with a solution in this case that going to keep him locked up, but he might have some hope that late in his life he might become parolable," Stephens said. "My personal opinion is that it's not going to happen."

Meanwhile, Heath said Eubanks told him that he's "going to do whatever he can do in prison to lead a life that has some meaning left in it."

"It's a very sad day for everyone," Heath said.

Vote for this story!

Comments

By cooper

May 10, 2008 6:36 PM | Link to this

I guess it is too late to ask why tina did not leave her husband when it was discovered that one of the kids had been violated by Tim. It is our responsibility to protect our kids from this and if she had of done just that and contacted the police when this first happened she would probably still be here with here with her children. Mothers please protect your kids......

By cooper

May 10, 2008 6:36 PM | Link to this

I guess it is too late to ask why tina did not leave her husband when it was discovered that one of the kids had been violated by Tim. It is our responsibility to protect our kids from this and if she had of done just that and contacted the police when this first happened she would probably still be here with here with her children. Mothers please protect your kids......

By B Barron

Apr 29, 2008 11:26 AM | Link to this

The Kirby's are a shining example to us all of the blessing and power of true and unconditional love. In the midst of such horrible tradgedy and emotional pain, those of us who know the Kirby family, find great comfort in knowing those children have Rick and Charlene as grandparents.
Tim Eubanks is also a shining example of the evil that exists in this world. He has not yet recieved what he deserves. It is impossible to calculate the damage he has done. I know that he will eventually pay, in full measure, all that justice demands.
It is unfair that the Kirby's have to sue for custody. They have earned it through their sacrifice and love for the children.
My prayers are for the victims in this tradgedy. The children have been hurt by the "animal" as well as his prosecutors. May the healing love of their Heavenly Father and their amazing family bless them for the rest of their lives

By friendof tinas

Apr 22, 2008 8:50 AM | Link to this

First I would like to start by saying Tina was a dear friend of mine. We met when we were both living in Hobbs. When she moved we remained in touch. Tina was the kind of person that would make you laugh with her stories so hard your stomach would hurt. She was always willing to lend a hand and pick you up when down. I spoke with her the Sunday before she was murdered. Before we hung up she wanted to brag about her childrens accomplishments. She was a very proud and great Mother and loved her children very much.

Now about the plea bargin. I was outradged!! when I heard what had happened. First if the DA had taken the time to visit with the kids she would have known they could have handled the trial. No it would not have been easy but for them it would have meant justice served for the murder of their Mother and the child molestation charges. I thought the moto was " DON"T MESS WITH TEXAS"? Well the DA sent the message "MESS WITH TEXAS AND GET AWAY WITH IT" Now that custody was not turned over to Rick and Charlene I guess that means that the state of Texas will be paying child support to the grandparents 600.00 per child x 5= 3000.00per month. Maybe the DA and John Heath need to split the cost since they pleaded the deal without the consent of the family. I would have to assume that neither of them have children and if they do they couldn't possibly have a daughter, because if they did and this was their daughter he would never see the light of day!!! Now this family has got to gather the strength to move forward in light of this stupid plea deal, I know they will be fine because they have friends and family support as well as their faith and that will see them through. My prayers are always with the family and I am greatful to be able to have them in my life.

By not fooled

Apr 21, 2008 9:03 PM | Link to this

This excuse for a judge knows of cases where perjury and false evidence, also a falsified autopsy report was used to convict an innocent man. He does not even know what he thinks until he asks the DA and is simply a rubber stamp and does whatever he is told. You will not find honor or integrity in Nacogdoches. He couldn't stand up to the DA, let alone the public. That's why he runs and hides. If everything they've done over there in the name of justice was exposed, they would probably all be disbarred if not in prison. All politics, no justice.

By Justice Not Served!

Apr 21, 2008 5:07 PM | Link to this

I can't let this go! I want to know if the judge new about the plea deal? If not, why was this serious case settled without him. Does he have the authority to recommend or throw out a plea deal based on the welfare of the family and the general public safety? I think this deserves some investigation. The set-in judge has nothing to worry about in a sense he is not from here and is interem and has no fall-out to worry about. He should have delayed the plea till all parties, family mainly, could be involved. Is this how small town politics work? I'm worried!

By Justice Not Served!

Apr 21, 2008 4:43 PM | Link to this

I quote "Stephens said she had been adamant during negotiations that the sentence never go below 35 years, her "line in the sand."
What in the world was the D.A. thinking? It seems as though that her mind was made up long before she went in for negotiations. I'm curious of how many depositions and or evidence was collected from the family; furthermore, his employer. I'm not a lawyer but I can tell you that when it comes to murder of an innocent person and child molestation as in this case, this was pre-meditated by anyone's thinking, after hearing from the family. From their comments, they also were ADAMANT about tesitfying! Give them that chance! If you failed, which you definitely wouldn't have because of the testimonies, then you know you tried your best. I think you mis-used your office and didn't do your home-work. This was pre-meditated murder without a doubt which would carry the death penalty. Then there is no question that we would never have to worry about this, "now NOT considered a child molester", child molester/murderer. He will be 74 if carries the full sentence which I doubt he will. Ms. Stephens, now has on record lowered the sentencing standards for animals such as this one. I wonder what Bill O'Riely would think of this case. She set a bad example in Nacogdoches county's justice system. Take a look at the Angelina County case of the 99 year prison sentence of a case of child molestation and learn. That's justice!
To the Kirby family, I'm so sorry for your loss! My prayers are with you, and ask God for comfort; he'll surely deliver for you what the D.A. wouldn't.
As for our new D.A., don't do this!

By Lisa A

Apr 20, 2008 10:42 PM | Link to this

I just want to say to the children of Tina..to all of you.Nacogdoches court people may have done you all wrong and your mother..But just remember. They all will have to answer to god in the end all of them.Even the Monster that done them things to you all.They will all pay.God be with you all.

By Lisa A

Apr 20, 2008 10:41 PM | Link to this

I just want to say to the children of Tina..to all of you.Nacogdoches court people may have done you all wrong and your mother..But just remember. They all will have to answer to god in the end all of them.Even the Monster that done them things to you all.They will all pay.God be with you all.

By not fooled

Apr 20, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this

Here's the reality. The judge, defense, and prosecution are all one tight little group in Nacogdoches. The trial is like a well-rehearsed play at the final performance to fool the public. You're not likely to change one mind on the jury since they are handpicked to vote like a herd of sheep, which they almost always do. These are all politicians doing what will give them the most points. The DA now has nothing to win so she doesn't care, this was no mistake. All they do is planned out. If people pay attention, you can just about predict their actions. Always follow the money or what gains the most.

[1 2 3 4 5 6] next

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.dailysentinel.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
 

Nacogdoches News | Nacogdoches Weather | Sports | Life | Business News | Opinions | Classifieds | Sitemap
Nacogdoches Cars | Nacogdoches Real Estate | Nacogdoches Jobs

Copyright 2008 The Daily Sentinel. All rights reserved. - The Daily Sentinel - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy.
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ.